Far More Historical Evidence For Jesus Than For Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism And Zoroastrianism

Did you know Buddha didn’t believe in God? Or that Hinduism’s chief character likely never existed? How about that a leading Islam apologist agreed Muhammed was 600 years too late to be credible on Jesus’ death? And what do we make of the 1,000 year range in which Zoroaster may have been born?

Photo by Emily KenCairn of Apiary Studio on Unsplash

All good questions, especially when compared with the historical evidence for the life, death and resurrection of Jesus, according to scholars Gary  Habermas and Benjamin C.F. Shaw, writing in the latest edition of Southern Equip:

“It is far from surprising that world religious adherents typically claim that their faith is unique in several regards. Christians are no different here. These are quite natural assertions, as everyone wants to believe that something so crucial to them is both different and well as exceptional.

“But Christians often go further. They claim frequently that they actually have evidence that their faith is different from all the others.” Go here for the rest of an article that may be quite eye-opening.

 

Author: Mark Tapscott

Follower of Christ, devoted husband of Claudia, doting father and grandfather, conservative lover of liberty, journalist and First Amendment fanatic, former Hill and Reagan aide, vintage Formula Ford racer, Okie by birth/Texan by blood/proud of both, resident of Maryland. Go here: https://hillfaith.blog/about-hillfaith-2/

One thought on “Far More Historical Evidence For Jesus Than For Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism And Zoroastrianism”

  1. Thank you, Mark, for this resource-documented article. God has given all of humankind the freedom to choose, but this comparison will, prayerfully, help more people to choose to follow Christ.

    Like

Comments are closed.